How Significant Were European Influences on the Development of Tudor Palaces?

European influence on Tudor palaces cannot beRenaissance styles derived from France and Italy. It is
measured easily, almost five hundred years ofcommonly accepted that Nonsuch Palace was Henry
architectural history has made the evidence hard toVIII's attempt to emulate, and even "out do" Francis I's
examine in detail and much evidence has been pavedhunting lodge at Chambord, which had been in
over or laid to waste. In order to examine the subjectprogress for twelve years when Nonsuch began
in any depth the research of scholars must be(Summerson, J. 1993). Chambord would have been a
examined and their interpretations of the remainingmagnificent building for the sixteenth century and
structures and artifacts assessed.Henry VIII probably wanted to make Nonsuch even
King Henry VIII himself would have had anmore imposing - hence it's name.
overwhelming influence over building works of the time.Both Hampton Court and Nonsuch Palace had lavishly
He was learned, the first King of England to write,decorated interiors; we know this from surviving
publish and print a book and he read compulsivelyartefacts and records. In terms of architecture, the
(Steane, J. 1998, p. 207). He desired power, anddecorations used in Nonsuch and Hampton Court
perhaps wished to be more powerful than the King ofPalace, had a distinctly European influence. For the
France (Gosman, M. 2005, p. 138). This ambitiondecorative finishing there is no doubt that Henry VIII
coupled with his academic knowledge may have beenused foreigners (Summerson, J. 1993). According to
used to build palaces designed to surpass theirEvelyn, Nonsuch was filled with plaster statues and
European counterparts.bass relievos (Summerson, J. 1993). The timbers were
Two different examples will be used to examinecovered with slates, which were arranged in different
European influence on Tudor palaces: Hampton Courtpatterns. This use of slate was unusual and probably
Palace and Nonsuch Palace. The impact of Europeandirectly influenced by Francis I use of slate at
influence will be evaluated alongside the propositionFontainebleau (Platt, C. 1995).
that the growth and power of the Henry VIII and his(Watkin, D. 1997) explains that the elaborate stucco
court was a greater shaping force on theirdecoration at Nonsuch was inspired by the palaces of
architecture. European influences will be considered inFrancis I at Chambord and Fontainebleau, where the
relation to the following themes: external appearanceItalian mannerists, Rosso and Primaticcio, had been at
including building materials, internal layout and thework since about 1530. Stucco is one of the materials
aesthetic interior. For these themes each palace will beused by plasterers and the term is used to describe
considered in turn. Before launching into the themes, itthe decorative plasterwork executed in stucco
is useful to give a brief history.(Gapper, C. 1999).
The period of the Reformation saw Henry VIII breakTimber was used to build the inner court at Nonsuch, in
from Rome and form his own church (Gosman, M. etorder to hold the long sequence of stucco panels that
al 2005). This period can be viewed as both disastrouswere to be its fame (Biddle, M. 1984).
and bountiful for architecture in England. It sawThe Nonsuch stuccoes appear to have been carried
widespread destruction of ancient abbeys and prioriesout by an English artificer, (?William) Kendall, and then
that had stood for five centuries (Summerson, J. 1993),by a foreigner called Giles Geringe (Biddle, M. 1984).
but it also saw Royal building work to an extent thatBiddle proposes that Nicholas Bellin of Moderna, who
had never been known before. By the end of his reignhad previously worked at Fontainebleau, drew
Henry VIII owned over fifty houses (Summerson, J.cartoons for the stuccoes. He describes them as
1993). These architectural works were built on thebeing in the mannerist style of Fontainebleau and
basis of a break from Rome, and as such, it could beproposes that Bellin was able to keep up to date by
said that this was a factor against European influence.receiving descriptions and illustrations from his friends
Hampton Court Palace is an accretive building thatat Fontainebleau.
began in 1514 as the largest house in England (Watkin,This would be entirely in keeping with the fashion,
D. 1997); it was owned by Cardinal Thomas Wolseywhere ideas and designs came across the channel in
(c.1471-1530) and given to Henry VIII in 1529. Half of thepattern books, and English craftsmen would re-create
Tudor palace is still visible next to the newer part ofthe work of their European counterparts using the
the palace built by Christopher Wren (1632-1723) frombooks. Although there is little evidence of pattern
1689-1694 (Tinniswood, A. 2001). Nonsuch Palace wasbooks from the building of Nonsuch and Hampton
begun in 1538; it was built from scratch as an elaborateCourt Palace, there are surviving pattern books from
"hunting lodge" and was not completed by the time ofthe medieval period. Together with the knowledge that
the King's death in 1547 (British Archaeology, 2009).Bellin received descriptions and illustrations from across
Unfortunately, whilst in the hands of Barbara Villiers,the channel to aid his craft, it could be proposed that
Countess of Castlemaine in 1682, the house waspattern books existed in some form at this time.
demolished and its parts and land sold (LondonStudents of Tudor architecture have the paintings of
Borough of Sutton, 2009). It is necessary to examineJoris Hoefnagel (1542-1601) to thank for the lasting
the remaining artefacts, including pictures andimages of Nonsuch and its intricate stuccoes.
descriptions to form an accurate picture of NonsuchA visit to Nonsuch by John Evelyn (1620-1706) in 1666
Palace.led him to write that the plasterwork must have been
There is some debate over when Henry VIII'sthe work of "some celebrated Italian"(Summerson, J.
improvements started and Cardinal Wolseys finished,1993) and there is further evidence for this. Henry VIII
(Thurley, S. 1988 and Curnow, P. 1984). When Henry VIIImust have employed European craftsman because
took over the palace from Wolsey it had not beenFrench writing has been found on the underside of
designed as a traditional Royal residence.decorations, indicating where to position them (Museum
Hampton Court's external appearance heralded a newof London, 2009).
era for Royal residences; it is constructed of distinctiveTapestries were an integral part of both palaces,
red brick. The tradition of brick usage in Europebringing decoration and warmth to the large spaces
probably came from Rome (Edson Armi, C. 2004), butdevoted to monarchy and court. (Steane, J. 1998)
the use of red-fired brick was a Burgundian concept.described tapestried walls in the presence chamber at
The Burgundian Court used brick even when thereNonsuch and there is a much-documented evidence
was an abundant supply of stone, as can be seenabout the tapestries at Hampton Court Palace. Henry
from the Palais de Savoy in Michelen, Belgium, builtVIII is believed to have owned over 2500 tapestries in
from 1507-1527 (Markschies, A. 2003). Brick, and itstotal.
different bonds - including Flemish for laying walls andAn inventory of his belongings in 1547 included a set of
other structures - had a huge impact on buildings fromActs of the Apostles tapestries, dated before 1528
the early sixteenth century and Hampton Court Palaceand undoubtedly made in Brussels (perhaps in Pieter
is a prime example of this. In 1532 special brick kilnsvan Aelst's workshop). Only a small fraction of Henry
were built near Hampton Court Palace to supply theVIII's tapestry collection survive and it is difficult to
enormous number of bricks needed (Thurley, S. 1988).know which pieces were at Nonsuch and Hampton
One of the surviving images of Nonsuch is a print byCourt. However, we know that these tapestries would
George Hoefnagle (1545-1600). From this image weprobably have originated from the Flemish regions of
can see the huge octagonal turrets that stand guardEurope (Campbell, T. 1996).
on the outside of the building, these may have been anThis essay does not give enough scope to discuss all
emulation of the Chateau de Chambord or they maythe decorative architectural features of the chosen
merely have been an expansion on normal Tudorpalaces, but the painting and frescoes at Hampton
theme - a mass flanked by octagons, as seen atCourt Palace should be noted. According to Thurley,
Richmond Palace (Summerson, J. 1993). Of morethe ceilings of the privy gallery were decorated with
impact in this image is what we cannot see: the villagethe standard Tudor "all over" decoration of divided
of Cuddington that was swept away; the stone fromsections with gold batons (Thurley, S. 1988). He says
the monasteries with which it was built. All of thesethat Henry Blankston and the painter Maynard, both
were symbolic of Henry VIII's ambition and ruthlessnessEnglish men, were responsible for this type of interior
(British Archaeology, 2009).decoration. However, when it comes to Henry's study,
At this point Henry VIII's love of chivalry and traditionwhich must have been of great importance to him, he
should be mentioned. Inspired to build Nonsuch by theseems to have designed the room himself. Hung with
birth of his long awaited son (London Borough ofpaintings by the Italian painter Toto del Nuziata
Sutton, 2009), the palace was intended as a triumphal(1498-1554), it is probable that he also painted the
celebration of his power and grandeur. It could befresco around the upper parts of the wall (Thurley, S.
argued that Nonsuch was inspired by Henry VIII's love1988). Toto del Nuziata held the office of sergeant
of chivalry, tradition and English antiquity. Henry VIIIpainter for the last ten years of his life.
would have kept close contact with scholars of hisIt can be seen that, from their outward appearance
age, including John Leland (1502-1552), who received athrough to their planning and interior design, Europe
Royal Scholarship in 1526. Leland journeyed widely andquite significantly influenced the style and construction
gathered much information (Williams, C. 1996), someof each of these two palaces. Henry VIII was a
pertaining to the "legend" of Camelot. In which case,powerful Tudor ruler, he was extremely proactive and
perhaps Camelot and not Chambord would have beenprolific in his building works, and was well read and well
Henry's inspiration.educated. The period in which these two palaces
When talking about external appearances and Tudorwere built was extraordinary, the Reformation forced
palaces, it is important to note that looks can bethe closure and destruction of the monasteries and
deceptive. Henry VIII liked to keep up appearances andabbeys and freed up much land for the Crown and
we can see this from the Field of the Cloth of Gold,nobility. All these things would have influenced the
when Henry VIII met with Francis I of France. Hebuilding of Tudor palaces and it is difficult to say which
erected a magnificent palace. Built on brick foundations,is most important. However, we know that Henry VIII's
the palace walls and roof were made of canvas,ambition was instrumental. In Hampton Court he
painted to create the illusion of solid materials. Thedesired to have the biggest lodgings in England and in
timber framework for this was imported from theNonsuch his ambition was to "out do" all of Europe.
Netherlands and was floated to Calais (Lloyd, C. &This combination of European influence and Henrican
Thurley, S. 1990). The overwhelming presence ofdesire was the driving factor in the building of these
timber products in the Netherlands at this time made ittwo palaces.
the obvious source for this structure (Te Brake, W.If you want to find out more about humanities /
Klooster, W. (eds). 2006)).architecture check out
The internal layout of Hampton Court was veryBibliography
different from the Royal castles that had gone beforeBiddle, M. 1984, The Stuccoes of Nonsuch, The
because it had no Keep. Earlier castles had beenBurlington Magazine, Vol. 126, No. 976, pp. 411-417.
designed with fortification in mind. Another differenceBritish Archaeology, Great Sites: Nonsuch Palace, 8th
was that the hall was not the only imposing interiorMarch 2009
(figure 1). Henry VIII added to the state apartments andBritish Library, Learning Medieval Realms, 15th March
designed them for an increasingly leisured and luxurious2009
way of living (Summerson, J. 1993). He also added aCampbell, T. 1996, School of Raphael Tapestries in the
long gallery and whether this was influenced by theCollection of Henry VIII, The Burlington Magazine, Vol.
French King Francis I's Grande Galerie at the Chateau138, No. 1115, pp. 69-78.
of Fontainebleau is not clear - building work began atCannon-Willard, C. 1967, The Concept of True Nobillity
Fontainebleau in 1528 (Markschies, A. 2003). Theat the Burgundian Court, Studies in the Rennaissance,
addition of the gallery may merely be an EnglishVol. 14, pp. 33-48.
tradition brought from Herstmonceux Castle (Coope, R.Cooper, R. 1986, The 'Long Gallery': Its Origins,
1986).Development, Use and Decoration, Architectural
Up until Henry VIII's reign, the English monarchy hadHistory, Vol. 29. pp. 43-84.
been lagging behind the French in terms of power andCurnow, P. 1984, The East Window of the Chapel at
influence. Henry VIII probably tried to equal the FrenchHampton Court Palace, Architectural History, Vol. 27,
King in every thing he did, especially building structurespp.1-14.
that demonstrated his grandeur and power (Gosman,Edson Armi, C. 2004, Design and Construction in
M. 2005).Romanesque Architecture, Cambridge University
Henry VIII paid great attention to the building of a libraryPress, Cambridge.
and here we see a strong Flemish influence. Almost allFidler, J. 1983, The Manufacture of Architectural
of Henry VIII's houses had libraries. The King's librarianTerracotta and Faience in the United Kingdom, Bulletin
at the time was Giles Dawes, a Fleming by birth, whoof the Association for Preservation Technology, Vol.
had been Henry VIII's childhood tutor (Thurley, S. 1988).15, No. 2, pp. 27-32.
It can safely be assumed that Dawes enthused HenryGapper, C. 1999, What is 'Stucco'? English
VIII with his passion for reading and therefore, libraries.Interpretations of an Italian Term, Architectural History,
The monarch's attitude towards courtly life had alsoVol. 42, pp. 333-343.
changed. The building of tennis courts, bowling alley,Gosman, M. (ed), 2005, Princes and Princely Culture
leisure gardens and jousting yard were a signal for a1450-1650, Vol. 2, Brill, Boekhandel en Drukkerij.
more leisured way of life, although the tennis courtJacques, D. 1999, The Compartiment System in Tudor
may have been Wolseys work c. 1529 (Thurley, S.England, Garden History, Vol. 27. No.1, pp. 32-53.
1988). This leisured way of life is almost certainlyLloyd, C. & Thurley, S. 1990, Henry VIII: Images of a
influenced by the Burgundian Court where jousting andTudor King, Phaidon Press, Oxford.
other recreational activities are documented longLondon Borough of Sutton, Nonsuch Palace, 8th March
before Henry VIII set about his extensions2009
(Cannon-Willard, C.1967). In the 1930's the Privy GardenMarkschies, A. 2003, Icons of Renaissance
was compartmented, this was a system thatArchitecture, Prestel, London.
dominated sixteenth century gardens across EuropeMuseum of London, Nonsuch Palace:from a Print by
and was hesitantly adopted in England (Jacques, D.George Hoefnagle, 11th March 2009
1999).Platt, C. 1995, Medieval England: A Social History and
In terms of layout, Nonsuch Palace is easier toArchaeology from the Conquest to 1600 AD,
understand because it was built from scratch, (figureRoutledge, Oxford.
2). (Steane, J. 1998) says that a "fully-fledged orderedSteane, J. 1998, Archaeology of the Medieval English
planning of a Royal palace is reached with Nonsuch."Monarchy, p. 93, Routledge. London.
This may be because Henry VIII built it in the last nineSummerson, J. 1993, Architecture in Britain 1530 - 1830,
years of his reign, with a great deal of architecturalYale University Press, London.
experience behind him.Thurley, S. 1988, Henry VIII and the Building of Hampton
Nonsuch was built around two courts. The basic planCourt: A Reconstruction of the Tudor Palace,
of the palace is straightforward and mostlyArchitectural History, Vol. 31, pp. 1-57.
symmetrical - although the functions of the individualTe Brake, W. & Klooster, W. (eds), 2006, Power
rooms are much more debatable given that the palaceand the City in the Netherlandic World, Brill Academic
was demolished over 300 years ago. With the "king'sPublishers, Leiden.
side" on the west and the "queen's side" on the east,Tinniswood, A. 2001, His Invention So Fertile: A Life of
they were connected through a privy gallery in theChristopher Wren, Oxford University Press
southern wing. The ground floor was taken up withIncorporated, Oxford.
rooms housing the queen's servants and, on the "king'sWatkin, D. 1997, English Architecture, Thames and
side" a grand staircase led from the guard chamber toHudson, London.
a waiting room adjoining the presence chamberWilliams, C. (ed), 1996, English Historical Documents,
(Steane, J. 1998).1485-1558, Routledge, New York.
Steane also describes Nonsuch as a fusion of