| 1. Indian Historians: Notorious or Ignorant | | | | less than other day’s data, confirming a logic |
| More than a hundred years ago, when History of India | | | | that first day as a beginning had taken time to gear up |
| was written under British influence, there was no room | | | | all Vanars. Second day it took momentum and rest of |
| for Ramayan and Mahabharat as historical events. | | | | the days the distance of the bridge constructed is |
| They were epics and of no importance for students. It | | | | found to be nearly same. A logical conclusion of this |
| is surprising that India is one country whose history has | | | | sort is made only when the event have occurred in |
| been written by its enemies and the whole nation yet | | | | reality. |
| follows it. No doubt the history was a strategic attack | | | | Why did Valmiki thrust his imagination to get the bridge |
| on Indian civilization and culture that paved way for | | | | completed only in 5 days? He could have well |
| western culture into the nation. With time, truth is | | | | increased the number of days to help people of today |
| evolving back. Science of India that was denied is now | | | | understand it more logically. Or he could have even |
| accepted through western influence. The myths are | | | | reduced the number of days to highlight the power of |
| suddenly appearing to be history. And one such history | | | | Lord Rama. |
| is Ram Sethu. Since, it is a history of Hindus, politics | | | | 5. The data that more than a crore (10 million) Vanaras |
| and literates are not ready to accept it as truth. | | | | were involved in building it, seems to be logical to fit to |
| If they are so intelligent, let them go through this article. I | | | | support the volume of the bridge constructed. Now, |
| challenge them through few questions mentioned in | | | | the count may not be exact, but surely Valmiki wants |
| bold in this article. | | | | to say that there was a huge task force working for |
| Let us have a background of what politicians and | | | | the bridge. |
| historians (British written history literates) say about | | | | Valmiki could have easily shown Lord Rama winning |
| Ram Sethu. | | | | the battle with few hundred Vanars as his soldiers |
| Historian B.D. Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru | | | | – why 10 million? |
| University says the archaeological record says nothing | | | | 6. The width vs. length ratio also looks scientific and |
| of the sort. There is no evidence of a human | | | | supportive to help carry such a huge mass across the |
| presence in the subcontinent, he says, before roughly | | | | bridge. The bridge is wide enough so as to withstand |
| 250,000 to 300,000 years ago. It is generally believed | | | | the weight of crores of Vanaras and allow passage |
| man's hominid ancestors did not leave their African | | | | to all of them. |
| home until about two million years ago. | | | | 7. The bridge is said to be built in 5 days, giving an idea |
| Very important point here is that Mr. Chattopadhyay | | | | that bridge had to be built in a very short period of |
| has forgot to note that what is said of hominid | | | | time, failing which the Opponent King Ravana would |
| ancestors is also a belief – a belief generated | | | | have come to know about it and would have attacked |
| by Western people and followed by Mr. | | | | never allowing the bridge to be constructed. Thus, the |
| Chattopadhyay – not Truth, not Science. Surely | | | | period fits the war logic. |
| Ramayan, if a belief is a belief of eastern people | | | | 8. The bridge is said to be constructed by around a |
| – Indian People. Mr. Chattopadhyay is trying to | | | | crore Vanaras, the count fits the possibility of getting |
| introduce a belief clash. | | | | the bridge constructed in such a small time – a |
| Why Mr. Chattopadhyay wants to defy a true | | | | huge task force doing it. Though, the methodology of |
| instance with a false belief? Does Mr. Chattopadhyay | | | | construction is not elaborated and shortened by |
| want to say that Lord Rama is deep in the heart of | | | | mentioning that various ‘Yantras’ or |
| billions of Indians to this date without any truth? Can | | | | Machinery were used to build the bridge, but it gives an |
| false beliefs find so deep root in society and for so | | | | indication that machinery were applied to do the task. It |
| long time? | | | | should be a subject to study about our past. Valmiki |
| I read a similar comment from N Ramanujam. Head, | | | | Ramayan: Yuddha Kanda, 22.60: |
| Post Graduate Department of Geology and Research | | | | ‘Hastimatran Mahakayah Pashananshch |
| Centre, V.O. Chidambaram College, Tuticorin. | | | | Mahabalah |
| He said that Adam's Bridge is only a chain of shoals | | | | Parvatanshch Samutpatya Yantraiyah Parivahanti |
| between the Palk Strait and the Gulf of Mannar, | | | | Cha’ |
| created by sedimentation owing to long shore currents. | | | | What was the need to mention that certain |
| Explaining the bridge's geological history, he said both | | | | Machineries were used for constructing the bridge? |
| the Palk Strait and the GoM were once part of the | | | | How did an ancient man imagine of machineries? |
| Cauvery basin, which was formed during the | | | | 9. Very interestingly, Rama is not said to have built the |
| separation of India and Antarctica about 70 million | | | | bridge and the point clarifies that building it was the skill |
| years ago during the `Gondwana period.' | | | | of an architect – Nala and not Rama or |
| They were combined till a ridge was formed in the | | | | Hanuman, the hero of the book. Had Ramayan been a |
| region owing to thinning of earth's crust. The | | | | fantasy of Maharishi Valmiki, he would easily |
| development of this ridge augmented the coral growth | | | | fantasized and written something like Rama built a |
| in the region. | | | | bridge of Arrows as Rama was the hero in fantasy. |
| "The coral cover acted as a `sand trapper' | | | | But it is not so, making one think that it is not fantasy |
| leading to the formation of Rameswaram Island," | | | | writing. |
| Dr. Ramanujam said. | | | | Why didn’t he tell the world that it was Lord |
| The long shore currents on the southern side of island | | | | Rama who builds it and give the credit to someone |
| created a discontinuous shoreline eastward from | | | | else of this great happening? After all, Lord Rama was |
| Dhanuskodi to Talaimannar, which's the Adam's Bridge. | | | | the hero of his imagination. |
| Let us see what Mr. Ramanujam has said: | | | | 10. Ramayan also depicts the materials used in making |
| How many such Chain of Shoals bridging two nations | | | | the bridge clarifying that it was a possibility, but not |
| is known to Dr. Ramanujam? Is there any other | | | | under imagination of human capacity under technology |
| Geographical construct anywhere in the world – | | | | support of today. |
| deposits of shoals along the coast doesn’t say | | | | 11. Seeing the time constraint, it looks logical to have |
| that it bridges two land pieces? | | | | Vanars who are brisk in their movement collecting |
| Again Mr. Ramanujam is taking support of another | | | | materials and fitting it in place as directed. |
| belief to beat the truth. He is talking of Gondwana | | | | 12. The places mentioned in Ramayan exactly |
| theory, a theory that has no concrete proof – | | | | matches to the current location of the bridge, thus |
| an imaginary thesis with some scientific logic behind it. | | | | confirming that the book is not a story. |
| Hundreds of such theory can be generated based on | | | | 13. The length of the bridge matches to what is |
| Geographical principles, but that do not defy a | | | | mentioned in Ramayan. |
| concrete reason of existence. | | | | So, looking at Ramayan alone one can conclude that |
| Why did Gondwana theory leave a trace of only One | | | | the Bridge is not a natural construct. Having proven on |
| Bridge on the Globe? | | | | the point of Bridge alone that Ramayan is not a book |
| Very important – Ramanujam is unable to | | | | of myth, but a book of History, it straight away brings |
| change the names of two places as Dhanuskodi and | | | | the truth that Maharishi Valmiki was the first Historian |
| Talaimannar which are not English names as they | | | | known to man kind |
| already exist, and hence successfully accepts a | | | | 3. Current Findings on RAM SETHU and their analysis |
| controversial English name of Adam’s Bridge | | | | However, we need to further analyze current findings |
| instead of Ram Setu. Mr. Ramanujam could very | | | | as well. |
| easily put his theory with the name of the Bridge still as | | | | 1. The first thing to consider is that under the current |
| Ram Setu. But he ends up in saying that is | | | | scientific evaluation, the bridge is proved to have a |
| Adam’s Bridge – WHY? | | | | chain of shoals is 30 to 35 km long in Palk Street, and |
| Why did Mr. Ramanujam accept Adam’s | | | | its unique curvature confirms that it is man made, and |
| theory to be correct? Does Mr. Ramanujam want to | | | | is not a Geographical Construct at all. |
| support that Adam and Eve existed and Lord Rama | | | | 2. Archeological findings have proven that first signs of |
| didn’t exist? | | | | human inhabitants in Sri Lanka date back to primitive |
| If yes, then Adam and Eve existed in India alone as the | | | | age of about 1,750,000 years of the same era as |
| bridge is in India – Again controversy – as | | | | Ramayan (‘Treta Yug’, which lies exactly |
| Manu Shatrupa would be more known names in this | | | | mid way to above number). |
| region and analogy to Adam and Eve. Moreover, | | | | 3. Sri Lankan Government has done Archeological |
| acceptance of Adam’s Bridge is acceptance | | | | Survey and found some very interesting data: |
| that it was build by Adam. Actually, the logic fits | | | | 4. A mountain covered completely with herbal plants |
| opposite to them – how can the first man on | | | | of same type that is found in Himalayas. There is no |
| earth build a bridge of that volume? He would be | | | | other mountain in whole Sri Lanka of that kind. This |
| immature at first place, he is alone at second place | | | | stands as an evidence that the mountain was brought |
| and why will he ever endeavor to bridge the sea? | | | | by Lord Hanuman to Sri Lanka – How was this |
| Though the only evidence is with India, no logic fits to | | | | done is subject to study? To my knowledge, Sri |
| the name as ‘Adam’s Bridge’. This | | | | Yantra of Hindu myth (or may be similar constructs) is |
| clearly reflects the Christian mentality trying to impose | | | | actually a anti-gravitation theory which was know to |
| and kill Hindu greatness. And poor Historians of India, | | | | our Rishis in those days and these things were |
| brought up in the education system of English, unable | | | | possible only by such means. Someday, science will |
| to break the boundary of false arrogance of being | | | | surely understand this. |
| high literary, seems to be helplessly saying that Ram | | | | 5. Ashok Vatika is traced with complete Greenery and |
| Setu Bandh is not historical. They cannot even hold a | | | | while soil. With a gap of hardly 10-20 meters, soil |
| petty vision that humans have build wall of length of | | | | suddenly turns to be black and burnt and it stretches |
| Great wall of China that is visible from even Satellite; | | | | to miles. This highly unnatural and it stands to prove |
| what would stop humans to build Ram Setu Bandh | | | | that Lord Hanuman had burnt Lanka. |
| and what is surprising or opposing to the fact that it | | | | There are many other proofs that have come up, but I |
| was built as a part of Ramayan as a history. | | | | consider these two points as strong as the Bridge |
| Does Mr. Ramanujam want to say that if Adam built it, | | | | itself. |
| it is history, but if Lord Rama built it it is a Myth and a | | | | Can our Historians consult the British again and create |
| natural construct? | | | | more theory around these evidences, so that they can |
| Professor Dupey says that as per Archeological | | | | be included in History books against Ramayan? |
| survey, remains from Ayodhya controversial site has | | | | 1. From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, most of the places still |
| found temple remains whose age do not go beyond | | | | hold the names as it was around a million years ago. |
| 600 B.C. | | | | Even the devastating Muslim invasion could not |
| Mr. Dubey: Do you want to say that if I build a temple | | | | eliminate the names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, |
| today, you will conclude that Lord Rama existed since | | | | Rameswaram, Lanka – all the names are as |
| today and not before? | | | | mentioned in the book. Rameswaram is the place |
| Temples are build and rebuild and their age can only | | | | where Lord Rama worshipped Lord Shiva and |
| say about the age of the temple and the age of the | | | | established the idol ‘Shiv Lingam’, exist to |
| personality whose worship is done in the temple. | | | | date as a place of worship. Ramayan talks about |
| We need to understand certain points here, modern | | | | Mahendragiri Mountain as the highest point and best |
| Archeology and Science is far different than what | | | | point to watch across the sea. Geographically, it is |
| used to exist in ancient India. For instance, old temples | | | | proven that Mahendragiri is the highest mountain in that |
| of India, yet existing, were built on a different | | | | area and gives a visibility of around 60 km range. |
| technology than what we find in modern civil | | | | Why don’t these politicians and historians say |
| engineering. This doesn’t mean that ancient | | | | how are these mentioned in Ramayan? Did these |
| archeology was not having mathematics maturity | | | | places pre-existed and Valmiki traveled a lot to create |
| – in fact, if we look at Temples of India, | | | | this story? Or these places were named after people |
| Jagannath Puri temple for instance, we do not find any | | | | read Valmiki Ramayan? |
| iron or pillars used to build the temple – yet it | | | | The more logical answer is, these places pre-existed |
| stands from hundreds of years to a height of around | | | | and the event took place which Valimiki wrote as |
| 200 ft. | | | | poetic history. |
| Assume that Puri temple would have been razed | | | | |
| some 10000 years ago, what technology or | | | | 1. Another important fictitious topic of Ramayan is |
| archeological proofs would be derived to conclude that | | | | ‘Pushpak Viman’ – a vehicle that |
| the temple was 200 ft high? | | | | could take aerial route to travel. No doubt the Pusphak |
| Similarly, the Ram Setu bandh has seen ages, and that | | | | Viman no more exists, but it cannot be fantasy as we |
| too not on land, but in sea – a turbulent sea. The | | | | have similar air planes telling about it. What challenges |
| major of the mass is already washed off – a | | | | the concept of Viman is the understanding that |
| question to be pondered is that what remains is just a | | | | technology has developed in current era and people |
| trace of the actual bridge – not the whole bridge | | | | were devoid of such high-tech products in ancient India. |
| as it was. | | | | But then Ramayan gives a background of Pushpak |
| Ramayan mentions that the bridge was built over the | | | | Viman in terms of how it was acquired, thereby |
| sea water, with support of Sea – this implies | | | | making one think that it was not a mere fantasy. It |
| that there was no supporting archeology involved in | | | | should not be expected from the book Ramayan to |
| constructing the bridge – this is easily supported | | | | describe the details of Pushpak Viman creation. The |
| by the failure of Archeology ground to trace such | | | | question that should be asked is where the actual |
| constructs under ground. Yet the presence of shoals | | | | scientific data of Hindu researches about building the |
| below the bridge and their type indicate that they | | | | Pushpak Viman got lost – and true history of |
| cannot be found in sea in the manner it exists at Ram | | | | India and world will evolve. |
| Sethu. | | | | Do our Historians want to say that if Pushpak Viman |
| Now, Mr. Dubey accepts that the age of Shoals found | | | | existed then Valmiki would have mentioned how it |
| at Ram Sethu goes around 1 million years. He | | | | was built? How many history book of today contains |
| misguides people, as he is a literate of History written | | | | the scientific methodology of building machinery |
| by British, that Ramayan was first written around | | | | – why don’t our historians first do this? |
| 10000 years ago and not 1 million years ago. Mr. | | | | 1. What seems to be mythical to the Historians and |
| Dubey, here is a simple calculation for you to further | | | | Science is the concept of Monkey building the Bridge. |
| investigate: | | | | But they forget to expand the vision on this, purely |
| The age of the bridge as per scientific dating comes | | | | because of their biased attitude to defeating Hindu |
| to around 1 million years. As per Hindu scriptures, | | | | faith. We all know now that there are many species |
| Ramayan took place in ‘Treta Yug’. | | | | that do not exist now and the largest known to human |
| Calculating by Hindu scriptures (Treta Yug with a | | | | is Dinosaur. Why can’t different specie exist |
| tenure of 12,96,000 years, Dwapar Yug with a tenure | | | | around 1 million years ago with the capacity of human |
| of 8, 64,000 years, Kali Yug has just seen 5,000 | | | | intelligence and monkey like physical structure – |
| years): We know that Treta Yug was before Dwapar | | | | something that was called as Vanars in those days? |
| Yug. So, one thing is quite evident. The Bridge was | | | | Science do not forget to mention that man evolved |
| constructed at least 8,64,000 years ago, i.e., 0.86 million | | | | out of monkeys – but defeats Hindus to |
| years ago, which is pretty close to 1 million years. Treta | | | | consider that Vanars were the in between form of the |
| Yuga itself is 1.3 million years of age. | | | | evolution the evidence present in those days. But no |
| How is that scientific age of the shoals and the Hindu | | | | view would consider this, simply because then the |
| calendar age of Lord Rama matches exactly? Will Mr. | | | | religion of peace would win then. Yet, there is no doubt |
| Dubey and other historians dare to come out of the | | | | that evolution theory is again a controversial theory |
| falsehood of our enemy teachings and try to explore | | | | existing and taught to people, without any scientific |
| some mathematics of Hindus before they say make | | | | evidence around it. |
| such stupid comparison of scientific ages? | | | | 2. No historian can deny the fact that there is a |
| 2. Analysis of Valmiki Ramayan over RAM SETHU | | | | coincidence and only one coincidence between a |
| Now, let us go into the Valmiki Ramayan and dig out | | | | reality and its occurrence in a book called Ramayan. |
| more history out of it. Let us be sure that if we want | | | | Instead, of now having set a direction to find out how |
| to dig history, we have to touch Valmiki Ramayan | | | | such thing took place, these catholic followers are |
| alone and not any other Ramayan, because all other | | | | simply applying all forces and theories to falsify a fact. |
| Ramayan are written with purpose of promoting | | | | Science is now saying that the age of earth is around |
| Ramayan and recording the event. | | | | 4 billion years – can science produce a history |
| Here are certain points from Valmiki Ramayan to be | | | | of 4 billion years with concrete proof – no one |
| considered: | | | | asks this question and believes science. No one knows |
| 1. There is no other book than Ramayan that has put | | | | how many generation of humanity evolved and got |
| into scriptures describing such geographical constructs. | | | | destroyed since the earth was formed. No one knows |
| 2. Ramayan says that it was build under the | | | | when the earth was exactly formed. Actual fictions |
| supervision of an Architect Nala – son of the | | | | and stories lie on this side as well – but our dear |
| greatest Architect of all times | | | | Historians do not have the courage to flatter about it. |
| ‘Vishwakarma’ (Note: | | | | I do not understand, if such an amazing construct is not |
| ‘Vishwakarma’ is a designation given to | | | | within the reach of modern science, why can’t |
| the greatest archeologist and builder of the era in | | | | this bridge be put as one of the Wonders? Why |
| ancient Hindu society, a similar practice as we have in | | | | can’t it be listed under World Heritages (yet |
| modern world of ‘Nobel Prize’). Thus, the | | | | maintain it as Hindu sacred place)? Instead, the |
| book makes sure that such a bridge can be | | | | anti-Hindu moves are motivating Congress to destroy |
| constructed by only architect of highest skill. | | | | the bridge. |
| Why do the politicians mislead the nation by saying that | | | | If the destruction of a 500 year old Babri Masjid is not |
| Lord Rama was a Superman who build the bridge, | | | | tolerable and it created havoc in the world, why is |
| when Ramayan clearly says that it is not Lord Rama | | | | million year old constructs not protected? Thousands |
| but the Architect Nala and Neela who build the bridge? | | | | of Hindu temples have been destroyed and are being |
| 3. The bridge was (Ramayan mentions the bridge | | | | destroyed to date in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh, |
| constructed in 5 days: 14 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 = 100 | | | | Malaysia, and so many other countries. Neither media |
| yojans) 100 Yojans long and 10 Yojans wide. Data to | | | | nor politics talks about it. Why shouldn’t Hindus |
| be considered here: | | | | stand now to protect Ram Sethu, which is a direct |
| 4. The data starts from 14 yojans as first day, which is | | | | proof of One million old history of India? |