The First Crusade

pe Urban II rose to his feet to address the multitudesWestern Francia especially, after the waning of royal
gathered before him at the Council of Clermont in 1095,power under the later Carolingians, it was upon the
his appeal was simple: letWestern Christendom marchknights that the task of defending Christian peoples by
to the aid of their brethren in the East. Whether theforce of arms against their internal and external foes
Crusades are regarded as the most tremendous andincreasingly rested; in recognition of this, the Church
romantic of Christian expeditions or the last of thebegan to bless their weapons of warfare. With the
barbarian invasions, they remain one of the mostSpanish ‘Crusades’ of the eleventh century,
exciting and colorful adventure stories in history. Thethe notion of the holy war against the infidel gained
reasons for joining the Crusade varied widely —currency. In due course, Pope Gregory VII
remittance from penance, a desire to see the Holy(1073—85) finally broke with the age-long
Places, greed for the power and booty that might bereluctance of Christians fully to recognize the licitness
captured. But the prize at the end of it all, be it spiritualof the procession of arms. He called upon the military
or temporal, was the Holy City of Jerusalem. Theclasses to take part in a ‘militia Christi’, or
journey’s spectacular culmination was the long‘militia sancti Petri’, in which they placed
siege of Jerusalem, at the end of which the Crusaders,themselves at the service of the vicar of St Peter. His
by a brilliant tactical maneuver, broke down its‘Crusading’ plan of 1074 was an abortive
defenses and poured into the city, which erupted in aattempt to mobilize them to help the Eastern Churches
bloody massacre. Steven Runicman’s Historyin face of Seldjuk attacks; and he expressed the hope
of the Crusades is justly acclaimed as the mostthat those who took part might, perhaps, also go on
complete and fascinating account of the historicand reach the Holy Sepulchre.5 Urban built upon
journey to save the Holy Land from the infidel. ThisGregory’s work; but he did not repeat the
abridgment makes accessible to a wider readershipmistake that led to its frustration. He appreciated that a
one of the most compelling historical narrativescall which was too straitly tied to the hierarchical claims
Pope Urban II’s Preaching of the First Crusade:of the Apostolic See was likely to find but little
It is doubtful whether the precise terms in which Urbanresponse. So he took the novel step of associating his
II preached the First Crusade at the conclusion of theown summons to a military enterprise with the idea of
Council of Clermont, on 27 November 1095, will evera pilgrimage. Hitherto, it had normally been requisite for
be known with certainty. Some altogether newa pilgrim to travel unarmed; those who responded to
evidence would have to be discovered regarding hisUrban’s summons at Clermont might make their
actual words. In the chronicles of the Crusade, therejourney armed, and yet still enjoy the spiritual benefits
are, it is true, five quite early versions of his preaching:of a pilgrimage.
in Fulcher of Chartres (written in 1101), Robert the MonkIn the meantime, four regular armies were being
(1107), Baldric of Dol (c.1108—10), Guibert ofmustered to follow the old pilgrim routes to
Nogent (c.1109), and William of Malmesbury (who wroteConstantinople for the official Crusade. A substantial
some thirty years after the Crusade). Of these writers,vanguard of Lotharingians and Rhinelanders under
the four earliest wrote as though they had beenGodfrey of Bouillon and his brother Baldwin arrived via
present at Clermont; Fulcher, and perhaps the otherHungary and the Balkans at the walls of the Byzantine
three, may well have been. Where they exhibit acapital on December 23, 1096. They followed the
measure of agreement regarding a theme ofapocryphal route of Charles the Great, by which the
Urban’s preaching, there is some likelihood of afirst Holy Roman Emperor was believed to have gone
genuine recollection or transmission of it. But Robert,to fight the infidels, undoubtedly a legend circulated to
Baldric, and Guibert all said that they gave the gist ofenhance the enthusiasm of the Crusaders in their
Urban’s words, not an accurate report of them;sacred quest. Anna Comnena estimated 10,000 knights
and there are considerable differences amongst theand 70,000 infantry apart from a multitude of camp
five versions. It is more than likely that the chroniclersfollowers. In the meantime, the bombastic Hugh
availed themselves of the customary licence by whichVermandois, brother of Philip I of France, together with
medieval writers put into the mouths of theira Franco-Norman band, crossed the Alps, Italy, and a
characters such discourses as the writers themselvestempestuous Adriatic, where he was shipwrecked
deemed to be appropriate. If they did so, theirnear Durazzo and was escorted by Byzantine legions
departures from Urban’s own words may wellto Constantinople. He was followed by Robert
have been considerable. There can be no doubt thatCurt-Hose, duke of Normandy, Stephen, count of Blois
the response to Urban’s preaching greatlyand Chartres, and finally Robert of Flanders. The
exceeded his expectations. The chroniclers’Normans from South Italy, numbering 10,000 knights
versions may have been to some extent influenced byand 20,000 career infantry warriors, under Bohemond,
the character of this response, so that theyson of Robert Guiscard, and Tancred, his nephew,
misrepresent what Urban said to elicit it. Historiansattained the eastern shord of the Adriatic below
have found no sure criteria for determining what wereDurazzo and proceeded to join the others in
the Pope’s original themes, in so far as theyNovember 1096. The Provencals under Raymond of
may have been preserved by the chroniclers; and theySaint-Gilles, count of Toulouse, accompanied by
have differed in their attempts to reconstruct them orAdh&nar, the apostolic legate, traversed the Alps and
to define what they may have been.North Italy to the shores of the Adriatic, where they
All of the chroniclers’ accounts, with thesuffered greatly until they also reached Durazzo and
exception of Fulcher’s, represent the Pope astook the usual road (Via Egnatia) across the Balkan
making much of the call to deliver the Holy City ofPeninsula to Constantinople via Thessalonica. The full
Jerusalem from pagan domination. But it is anarray became complete in May 1097. Tne highest
attractive hypothesis that, in November 1095, Urbanestimate is provided by Fulcher as 600,000, and the
was not primarily concerned with Jerusalem, if indeedlowest by Raymond of Aguilers at 100,000, which is
he mentioned it at all. Ever since he had become Popenearly the equivalent of the whole Byzantine army.
in 1088, he had been anxious to improve relations withAllowing for medieval exaggeration, even the lowest
the Byzantine Emperor, Alexius Comnenus, and tofigure must have confronted the imperial household
promote the union of the Eastern and Westernwith a tremendous problem in the matter of logistics
Churches. In March 1095, at the Council of Piacenza,and of transportation to Anatolia.
Alexius’s envoys had moved Urban to call uponAfter patching up a compromise on the application of
western warriors to go to Byzantium and help Alexiusthe rule of international law regarding the position of the
to defend the Church against the pagans.3 May it notWestern feudal magnates vis4-vis the Eastern Roman
have been that, in France, Urban intended to publish aEmpire, arrangements were made for conveyance of
further and wider statement of this call? If so, histhe Crusaders to Asia Minor without further delay.
summons was to help the Eastern Christians inThey were persuaded to swear an oath of fealty to
general. If Jerusalem came into the picture, it did sothe Emperor and to owe him allegiance for their future
secondarily and not necessarily as a military objective.conquests, an oath which they did not mean to keep,
Perhaps, even, it did not come in at all, but wasat least in connection with the Holy Places. The
introduced later by an upsurge of popular enthusiasmcampaign was inaugurated with the capture of Nicaea,
and religious zeal.which they ceded to an imperial garrison, on June 19,
In one form or another, such questions have been1097. Then the discomfiture of the main Turkish forces
widely asked, especially since they were canvassedunder Qilij Arslan at Dorylaeum, in the hot summer
by C. Erdmann in a study of the origin of Crusadingdays of July 1097, opened up the Anatolian route to
ideas, which has dominated discussion during the pastSyria, and some of the leaders began to envision
generation. Erdmann saw the First Crusade as theprospects of principalities of their own. Friction
culmination of the long process by which there tookbetween them became evident in the race of Tancred
shape, in Western Europe, the idea of a holy warand Baldwin to capture the Armenian Taurus in
against the heathen, sponsored by the Church. InSeptember.