The Spatial Context of the Bible

If one believes that the examination of the Bible limitsinterest in defining and delimiting "the territory" of the
itself only to its text, one couldn't be more wrong.biblical events. Due to the fact that the contents of the
Cultural anthropology is another branch of researchHoly Book revolve around the life and history of
that gets involved in the exegesis process. ThisJewish people in the area of current Israel, the term
scientific field attempts to explain in a nonjudgmental"biblical archeology" is sometimes replaced by the
and objective way what is the role that religion orarcheology of the land of Israel. Still, some scientists
history plays within a certain culture through the prismconsider both terms too restrictive seeing that many
of social, psychological and intellectual aspects.biblical events were placed in Egypt, Mesopotamia and
For instance, understanding the principles, sayings andother regions. As a consequence, they call themselves
teachings of Jesus, one needs to know the culturalarcheologists of the lands of the Bible or of the Near
and historical contexts of the time. His story is put in aEast.
special light when getting acquainted with hisNevertheless, Palestine encompasses more or less the
background, namely being a Jew who lived in Palestinegeographical area within which the majority of the
under Roman occupation.biblical events took place. Derived form the word
A great contribution to unraveling some of thePhilistine, which denominated the people who lived
mysteries of the Bible was brought throughalong the coast, Palestine refers to the region located
archeology. The scope of this discipline is related to theat the crossroads between Egypt and other large
study of the remains of the human past (ancientancient civilizations to the North and East (Phoenicians
artifacts, texts and bones) in order to obtain insight ofand Mesopotamians). The name was used until the
passed historical periods. Archeology has beenformation of the modern state of Israel in 1948. This
considered a "tool" of testing the truth of the thingsregion was a source of dispute because of its qualities,
emitted in the Bible. Biblical archeology settles itswhich justified the paraphrase "the Promised Land".