Why Latin is a Dead Language and What You Can Learn From It

Although hundreds of individuals teach Latin for a living,Latin, like an enterprise that loses customers, went
few of them spend time explaining why it became abankrupt. The decline of the ancient language must
dead language. If you read about its history, facts arehave begun before the barbarian invasions. Most likely,
presented as self-evident and no general lessons areLatin would have decayed even if the Roman Empire
drawn.had lasted another century.
The official version of the story is that, when theInsolvent companies that blame their difficulties on the
Roman Empire was conquered in the 5th century,market show blindness to the real cause of their
barbarian words polluted the purity of ancient speech.financial demise. If competitors have stayed in business
Foreign influences changed the manner of writing Latin,and thrived, why did a specific company go bankrupt?
did away with its grammar, and distorted itsWhy did Latin wane into oblivion despite all efforts to
pronunciation.keep it alive?
During the Middle Ages, clerics and lawyers tried toLovers of ancient languages will seldom give you the
maintain the old language alive, overall with littleanswer to that question: Latin was highly inefficient.
success. The quality of written Latin deteriorated atLeft to its own devices, it was unable to maintain itself.
the same speed as it was taught to youngerIts grammar was calling for simplification. It was too
generations. The spoken word, undisturbed bydifficult to learn and brought little value to the table.
grammatical constraints, became approximative andFour major languages of our age, Italian, French,
vague.Spanish, and Portuguese, are derived from Latin. All
By the end of the 16th century, the great language offour have shed the overcomplicated structure that
antiquity was clinically death, although a few volumesmade Latin so inefficient. The cost of maintenance
were still written and published in Latin in the 17thbecame to heavy and the old construction fell apart.
century. Those relics symbolize man's reluctance toLike a bankrupt company, Latin collapsed under the
acknowledge tidal changes that disrupt establishedweight of its liabilities.
patterns of thought.The ancient language built sentences by adding affixes
The expulsion of Latin to the realm of the deadto adjective and names depending on their
becomes an intriguing question when we compare itgrammatical role, gender, and number. In order to
with other achievements of the time, such as the lawscreate a correct sentence, each name and adjective
of Ancient Rome. In contrast to language, the principleshad to be combined with the right affix. Latin had many
of Roman law have survived the passage of time anddifferent affixes, which varied from name to name and
can be found today in the civil code of numerouscase to case. In contrast, modern Spanish just adds "s"
European and South American countries.for most plurals.
While Latin was dead and buried centuries ago, ancientSpeaking correct Latin required extensive training that
Roman law still permeates our culture and institutions.few could afford in the Middle Ages. Even with our
The logic of modern contracts replicates themost advanced learning methods, languages that
arguments of ancient jurisprudence; our courtcontinue to use numerous affixes for names and
procedures follow the steps conceived by Romanadjectives demand great efforts of foreigners who
magistrates; our conception of marriage andwish to learn them.
inheritance is derived from ancient family law.Trying to maintain Latin alive was the quintessential
Causality is the weak point in the official story of thedead-end project. Relatively few people were willing to
disappearance of Latin. If ancient language wasdevote resources to the undertaking; its cost far
polluted by barbarian influences, so was Roman law. Ifexceeded the capital available. The project was
grammar and pronunciation lost their original purity, sodoomed from the start; those who believed that it
did Roman law. Nevertheless, legal principles survivedcould succeed were massively unrealistic.
and Latin is no longer alive.The ancient language did not die the glorious death of
A closer look at the facts reveals that Latin did nota heroic medieval knight; it perished from starvation
actually die, but was displaced. It was not destroyed orand neglect. Its structural inefficiency rendered it unable
dismantled, but abandoned. Nobody took active stepsto compete. History broke it down and scattered the
to eliminate it from the minds of citizens. People justremnants. The clock stopped at a time when it could
stopped using it, like a car that is too old to be worthnot be repaired.
repairing.Has the lesson been learned? Have we grown
Financiers know that there is a world of differencecapable of recognizing and avoiding dead-end
between a company that is taken over and one thatprojects? Anyone willing to recognize mistakes can
goes bankrupt. The official story is that Latin wasacquire the necessary knowledge and perspective.
merged or transformed into medieval languages. WhileLatin is a dead language and rightly so. The next time
this aspect is indisputable, it misses an important part ofthat someone asks you to participate in a project,
the picture.make sure that is has a future.
The truth must include the acknowledgement that